I'm shocked that people who think not spending billions of dollars won't help us reduce the debt. I'm also amazed at how much worrying we do about the deficit - without talking about the debt at all.
As I understand it, the deficit is this years debt, but the total debt gets a lot less attention - at least when we are talking about solutions. I think we are way past trying to have a good year where we don't go too far into debt. We need a string of good years until we are totally out of debt.
For those who think a big transfer of wealth via government intervention in health care will help, and that repealing it won't, I guess I'd have to refer you to people who study this professionaly: http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703954004576089702354292100.html
I guess that doesn't address the issue of whether it will be repealed, doesn't seem like it will. Still, if we could all get on the same page that we have a big whole in the ship, that the golden goose has the flu, that the money tree is being cut down to make money, I think then we could start to talk more realistically - and theory has it, in a democracy that is all you need, right?
I'm sure there is something better than only rich people get to be healthy, and something more realistic than everyone can now have as much of everything as they could ever possibly want. And I'm tired of blaming the politicians.
By Amanda Hill
January 28th at 4:15pm Comment (1)
You are currently not logged into to the Friends of the U.S. Chamber Discussion board.
If you would like to start a new thread, please create an account or log in.