Fiscal Deal Opens Door To Big Tax And Entitlement Changes.
October 18, 2013
The deal struck Wednesday in Washington could make it easier for lawmakers to make big changes to tax policy, spending and entitlement programs.
Here’s a look at what is in the accord, what didn’t make the cut and what’s coming down the pipeline.
This deal is an important way forward for big policy changes
While a lot of the news focused on the aspects of the deal that ended the shutdown and prevented default, the plan also calls for an agreement by mid-December on a long-term budget plan.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said on the Senate floor Wednesday that under his agreement with Senate GOP Leader Mitch McConnell, the two leaders would name members to a bicameral budget conference committee “that will set our country on a long-term path to fiscal sustainability.”
The House and Senate each have already passed their own conflicting versions of a budget plan for 2014. The aim of this committee would be to come up with a compromise budget blueprint which would then be put to a vote in each House.
This blueprint could be the vehicle for major policy changes intended to reduce budget deficits and debt. These might include tax increases and curbs in the entitlement programs such as Medicare.
The budget plan could also include a relaxation of the cuts in discretionary spending -- the sequester -- that are required by the 2011 Budget Control Act.
The ultimate deal may end up looking like the one that House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan, R-Wisc., proposed last week in a Wall Street Journal op-ed: “We could provide relief from the discretionary spending levels in the Budget Control Act in exchange for structural reforms to entitlement programs.”
Ryan -- who would be a leader of the conference committee -- said what he has in mind “isn’t a grand bargain,” but “modest reforms to entitlement programs and the tax code.”
He noted approvingly that Obama has already called for wealthier retirees to pay higher premiums for their Medicare coverage than they now do.
A filibuster-proof fast track to reform
Under Senate rules, a budget resolution is subject to a special fast-track process. The rules do not allow a member -- Sen. Ted Cruz, R-Texas, or any other senator -- to use a filibuster to block it. This fast-track process is called “budget reconciliation.”
“Probably the most important part of budget reconciliation is that a reconciliation bill can approve policy reforms with only 51 votes in the Senate,” said Loren Adler, the research director at the Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget. This fast-track process “could be critical in increasing the chances for tax reform” and reform of entitlement programs to succeed.
Adler added, “Now that we have lawmakers back to the negotiating table, this is our best opportunity to enact a deal to reform our entitlements and tax code, restore investments and put our debt on a sustainable downward path as a share of the economy.”
Of course, there’s no guarantee that the conference committee members will be able to agree on a plan.
Taking a pessimistic view was Jason Fichtner, senior research fellow at the Mercatus Center at George Mason University who served as chief economist of the Social Security Administration.
“We’ve been here before,” Fichtner said. “How can we seriously expect any new conference committee to resolve the same difficult decisions that faced the (2011) Super Committee, the National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform (a.k.a. Simpson-Bowles) and have faced the House and Senate that resulted in this government shutdown in the first place? We can’t.”
What Republicans were able to keep as part of the agreement
McConnell said Wednesday as the deal was unveiled that he was confident that “we’ll be able to announce that we’re protecting the government spending reductions that both parties agreed to under the Budget Control Act and that the president signed into law. That’s been a top priority for me and for my colleagues on the Republican side of the aisle throughout this debate and it’s been worth the effort.”
But the conference committee might end up reducing or cancelling some of those Budget Control Act spending reductions.
What the accord doesn’t include
The goals that conservative Republicans had been seeking since the standoff started last month were not part of the bill Congress passed Wednesday night.
Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., said on Twitter: “To say we as Republicans left a lot on the table would be one of the biggest understatements in American political history.”
In particular, Republicans did not get:
Immediate agreed-to entitlement spending reductions or curbs, which was one of House Speaker John Boehner’s demands in return for increasing the debt limit.
A defunding of the Affordable Care Act, or Obamacare, a goal of Cruz and his conservative allies, or a delay in Obamacare’s individual mandate, the requirement that uninsured people buy health insurance.
A repeal of or delay in the medical device tax, a part of the Affordable Care Act designed to raise money to help pay the cost of insuring uninsured people. That tax will cost medical device manufacturers and importers $32.5 billion over the next ten years.
Ending the policy of the federal government paying a share of health insurance costs for members of Congress and congressional employees, an idea championed by Sen. David Vitter, R-La.